The A-ha Moment: Principals Using Coaching Techniques for Teacher Evaluation

With more and more schools turning to Charlotte Danielson’s framework, districts are requesting that principals train their staff in understanding her rubrics. The difference between the “proficient” and the “distinguished” columns is the presence of teacher-centered versus student-centered instruction. While this concept is clearly not new, her analysis and blueprint is greatly needed.

In years past, teachers anxiously awaited the semi-yearly to yearly observations by their assistant principals or principals. Teachers often expressed that it was similar to driving in a car and approaching a traffic light. What part of the lesson received a red light for failure, a yellow light of caution, or a green light for success? Did they squeak through the yellow light, resulting in an officer pulling them over with a “got-ya” ticket? Well, with a new approach of infusing life coaching skills into the educational arena, hopefully this old type of teacher evaluation will become archived as ancient history.

In the past decade, schools hired literacy and math coaches for elementary schools to support their teachers. The idea of utilizing coaching skills within education proved to be successful. Our last book, Teachers as Classroom Coaches brought new coaching techniques to the classroom for all grades. K-12. As the tide is turning towards a coaching model, districts are realizing that coaching teachers provides better results than traditionally evaluating teachers.

So, what is the difference between traditional evaluation and a reflective coaching model? It’s respecting the thought processes of teachers. It is the belief that they have the ability to analyze their own instruction and design objectives and pathways of growth that can be assessed. But in order to achieve this goal, principals need to be trained in educational coaching.  Then they can pose the right questions that provoke teachers to analyze their own instruction in a non-threatening manner. Nothing is more valuable than a person generating his or her own analysis and reaching an “a-ha moment”. If we want student-centered instruction, then why wouldn’t we want teacher-centered evaluation?

In our first book, we outlined many of the coaching techniques and used the classroom setting to bring them to life. Now we review those techniques and introduce you to several new techniques that principals may use during teacher evaluation sessions or walk-throughs. If we want “everyone on board”, then it is important to respect the different perspectives of the administrators and the classroom teachers, while still using many of the same coaching strategies. Why would these models and strategies be used only by literacy coaches and teachers, but not administrators? It doesn’t make sense.

So the time has come. And nothing is more powerful to drive student-centered instruction than the techniques used during teacher evaluation. If teachers know that they are being evaluated towards a goal, clearly outlined on a rubric, then they will modify their techniques to reach the highest level of proficiency. If this technique of negotiable contracting and using rubrics in classroom has clearly worked in the classroom, then why wouldn’t it work for teacher evaluations?

About Andi Stix

Site administrator and creator
This entry was posted in Assessment, Classroom Coaching, Coaching, Coaching Teachers, Rubrics and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to The A-ha Moment: Principals Using Coaching Techniques for Teacher Evaluation

  1. authentic'blog says:

    You can certainly see your enthusiasm in the work you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe. Always follow your heart.

  2. return man 2 says:

    Hi, do you have a facebook ID?

  3. Amedar Consulting says:

    It’s exhausting to seek out educated people on this matter of effectively using the Danielson Framework for assessment, but you sound like you understand what you’re speaking about! Thanks

  4. H.P. says:

    Hello! Would you mind if I share your blog with my myspace group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Thank you

  5. blouson moncler homme says:

    Just what I needed, thanks a lot…. Principals should think about giving up the gotcha form of assessment and turn to using coaching practices with their teachers.

  6. Anthony says:

    Everyone loves your posts here at my school. I think that if we want to have better relationships with our teachers, then we need to collaborate more. Using coaching tools certainly opens up an avenue for just that! Keep up the excellent work.

Comments are closed.