Schools Beware: Facebook Owns Your Words

© 2012 Andi Stix, Ed.D. 

With on-line communication transforming the world, many education departments across the country have banned social media in schools for protective measures. Now, districts are readdressing these bans and seeking more effective guidelines. As an educator for more than 35 years, I believe it is time to ask ourselves the following questions:

How can schools:

  • protect their students?
  • monitor the content of hundreds of teachers’ messages?
  • regulate personal versus professional text messaging and/or posts on Facebook/ Twitter/ YouTube, Flickr, etc.?

Not a moment too soon, the New York City Department of Education is now thinking about the role of social media in its public schools and how it may impact teachers and students. This week, preliminary social media guidelines were released. However; according to Deputy Counsel Robin Greenfield, “The guidelines are not in place yet.  Principals received a letter explaining that they will be effective in the fall.”  They will have an opportunity to offer comments this month and in July.

The NYCDOE is finally facing the reality that social media is here to stay. Previously, they banned teacher access to Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from their website portal. Of course, they were concerned with teacher-student relationships that could develop in an unprofessional manner. Even before the advent of social media, there were cases where professional boundaries were crossed, resulting in disciplinary actions.

What also begs for discussion is how teachers’ and students’ words can be used in advertisements without their knowledge, briefly covered in the NYCDOE guidelines Section D, #3c. With the new timeline and format of Facebook, every word is now accountable and traceable. Businesses and schools cannot create a professional page today, unless its origin comes from someone’s personal Facebook profile. In my case, I have a personal profile page, Andi Stix, but have professional pages in education that are linked off my personal profile, which are The Interactive Classroom and Synergy Westchester. Therefore, everything is traceable to me. And so, I am diligent in separating my personal life from my educational consulting.

So, what are school systems to do? Professional Development is key. It is the district’s responsibility to inform staff of the potential dangers to them and to their students of inappropriate use of social media vehicles.

Did you know that everything that is posted on Facebook belongs to Facebook? Many people find this disturbing, but this should come as no surprise. A decade ago, I was interviewed by the Philadelphia Inquirer and the publication held that copyright; so too now with Facebook.

Many principals are currently faced with the responsibility, according to preliminary NYCDOE guidelines, for obtaining permission from parents before posting their children’s work on the internet as well as giving permission to teachers to host Facebook pages, blogs, picture warehouses for photographs, etc. Principals are having peer group discussions with other administrators to understand the ramifications of the guidelines. Some schools are allocating a professional development day for their teachers outlining how social media may impact their school and its image.

At the present time, I’m getting certified in Social Media at Purchase College. As explained by one of my professors, Linda Solomon, “As Facebook goes public, it’s all about profits.” Teachers and students need to be warned that their words can go viral without their knowledge. Companies have figured out a way to capitalize on their content.

Here’s a perfect illustration: Let’s say that you post a message stating that you love your new Fendi bag. Do you know that Facebook can give Fendi permission to use your name in their ads without your knowledge? (When signing up for a Facebook page, you agree to their terms and this is one of them found in the fine print.)

In preparing to train teachers in Social Media and its potential danger, I examined how advertisements were posted on the right-hand side of Facebook, where they have always been located. But here is what surprised me: When I scrolled down the listing of my contacts on my Friends page, I specifically focused on my niece Rori, who posted a picture of her baby, which is circled below:

So, I clicked on her link and these advertisements were found on her page:

Two of my friend’s “likes” were made into advertisements.

 

When I contacted Sophia Gonzalez and Pam North, they were unaware that their names were being used for commercial purposes by Fendi and Viking River Cruises.

 

Facebook shared my friends’ interests with companies who then used their names in online advertisements. Then, those companies posted advertisements on all of Sophia’s and Pam’s friends Facebook pages who fit the same demographic profile and target their Friend’s Friends. Here’s the process:

  1. Sophia likes Fendi.
  2. Fendi buys an ad campaign from Facebook to target friends of Sophia’s who share the same demographic profile.
  3. Ads show up across Facebook, targeting those people. (me, Andi)
  4. I click on that ad to view it.
  5. Now, all of my friends see an ad that Andi likes Fendi.

Moreover, there are other companies besides Facebook, such as Taykey, that analyze post messages in your newsfeed and profile. If Sophia states, “I love my new Fendi bag,” her words can be picked up for potential advertising. Here’s the process:

  1. Fendi contacts Taykey to find people who like their Fendi bag on Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc.
  2. Taykey will first place a Facebook ad on those people’s pages and then target their friends who may also show an interest in Fendi.

Therefore, teachers have to be aware of their endorsements as well as anything negative that they have to say, either representing themselves, their schools, or their students. Once something is posted, it lives on the internet FOREVER.

If you take the average number of friends on your profile page, being approximately 140, and multiply the reach of your friends, that could provide companies access to approximately 300,000 per fan. This line of advertising was formulated, according to Erik Qualman’s book Socialnomics, because 90% of people trust their friends’ recommendations as opposed to 14% of advertisements.

So what does this mean for school systems?

Strict guidelines must not only be disseminated but also be discussed in detail by all schools. Each and every word that is written can either boost a school’s image or destroy it. Teachers need to be aware of how public their messages and their students’ work can become. Based on the new preliminary guidelines, the arduous task of monitoring social media falls on the supervisors.

Am I fan of social media? Yes. I’ve run professional development for the Interactive Classroom for 20 years. And this is a new stage of interaction. The opportunity to do that which was unimaginable has finally arrived where students’ works and ideas can be shared globally with such ease.

In the past few decades, we learned that the quality of students’ writing is so vastly different when it is only read by one’s teacher versus being shared by one’s peers. But now, the opportunity to share work globally is a huge incentive to raise the bar of student achievement, if used properly. However, with the world of social media exploding, teachers need clear boundaries of what is publicly owned, what is professional and what is personal.

So, let’s make sure that we do it right. In order to protect our students, let’s monitor the content and regulate what is private versus public. Let’s get involved and help shape the debate.

What’s your opinion? In what ways can schools offer regulations that will protect their students but allow supervised freedom of speech? (To reply, please click on the comment link next to the title or scroll down.)

—————————————

Click here to view NYCDOE’s preliminary social media guidelines.

 

Andi Stix is an educational consultant & coach who specializes in differentiation, interactive learning, writing across the curriculum, classroom coaching and gifted education. For further information on her specialties or social media, please email her on the Contact page.

Click here to receive a PDF version of this article.

About Andi Stix

Site administrator and creator
This entry was posted in Articles, Speeches & Past Posts, Motivation, Social Media, Speeches and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Schools Beware: Facebook Owns Your Words

  1. Dawn Stier says:

    Thank you Andi for sharing this with me. It was a very interesting read as well as a little scary! I forwarded your blog to some teachers I know, hope they enjoy it. I also forwarded it to my daughters, one of which should find it informative since she has school age children.
    Dawn

  2. Andi,
    Your blog is right on the money. I discuss this with 5th and 6th graders who leave all kind of silly tidbits on Facebook. As these children enter High School the material they post can potentially have a lasting effect. The children need to understand that this material lives forever and is no longer their property. What’s funny today might not be in 10 years when they apply to Medical School. It’s very scary for our children
    Anthony Rich

    • Andi Stix says:

      Thanks for your reply, Anthony. Stay tuned for future posts that deal with social media. Even though I specialize in all strategies in education, I’m focusing on social media right now. We have just begun bringing it into the schools and I think it is marvelous. However, students need to understand how to protect themselves.

  3. Marc Janis says:

    very informative.

  4. Helen Gurny says:

    Andi-
    I had no idea that what I write on Facebook could be used for or against me. I will pick my words carefully. Thank you for sharing this important information with me.

  5. Andi, love your blog!

    I’m interested in how to encourage academic administrations to find creative ways to integrate social networking into learning approaches, rather than enforcing strict limits and forbidding participation among faculty and students. Material ‘living forever’ is less disturbing to me than the power of authority to cut off the internet’s potential for education, sharing, and expansive global communications.

    • Andi Stix says:

      As more guidelines develop, Gail, districts will open up their portals. Give it time. However, teachers need to realize that their behavior on the internet sets an example for their students.

  6. Deusete says:

    Thanks for presenting your ideas and thoughts to us.

  7. Dagmar says:

    I hope you keep posting those wonderful articles, thanks a lot.

  8. kerry katona says:

    Albert Einstein: “Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.”

  9. Carina says:

    Thank you for the article. I’m definitely a lot more informed now on how Facebook can use my information.

  10. Pingback: The Top 6 Reasons for Schools to Teach Safe Practices in Social Media | Stix Picks for the Interactive Classroom

Comments are closed.